TAYA365 RTP Slip: Which Studios Print a Figure and Which Leave It Blank
By TAYA365 Editorial Team
- Line 1: 21 and overEvery slip here is written for adults 21 and up, the Philippine floor for casino play, whatever age box a TAYA365 form shows.
- Line 2: buttons open 76JLOur PLAY NOW and REGISTER NOW buttons carry one referral link, to 76JL; none of them opens the TAYA365 lobby.
- Line 3: matched to public papersAge, wallet and licence lines are set against PAGCOR lists and BSP circulars before they print.
A search for taya365 rtp is usually a hunt for the loosest slot. The honest answer starts with a gap: JILI, the studio behind the titles people name most, prints no RTP on any of the 18 game pages read for this site. This slip lines up the figures that exist, their sources, and how each one reads.
TAYA365 RTP: Six Titles With a Studio Figure
- Mahjong Ways. 96.92%, medium volatility, maximum win x25000, from PG Soft’s published data.
- Mahjong Ways 2. 96.95%, medium, maximum win x100000.
- Fortune Tiger. 96.81%, medium, 2500x.
- Lucky Neko. 96.73%, medium, x100000.
- Wild Bandito. 96.73%, session volatility Medium, x25000.
- Wild Bounty Showdown. 96.75%, high volatility, 5000x.
All six sit on the lobby’s PG tab, which the lobby labels “PG Slot”. Total: six figures, one studio, and no figure for a JILI title.
Why JILI Titles Show “Not Published”
A JILI game page has fields for paylines, volatility, max win and publish time. No field for RTP. Outside sites still quote one, and for Super Ace their figures run anywhere from 95.69% to 97.8%. A number that moves two points between sources is not a measurement, so these pages print “not published” and send the reader to the game’s own screen.
| Studio | Prints an RTP? | Note |
|---|---|---|
| PG Soft | Yes | Read from its published game data |
| Pragmatic Play | Yes, one figure | Some titles also ship in lower operator-selected versions |
| JILI | No | Ceiling and volatility only |
Total: two studios print, one does not.
What the Percentage Measures
RTP is the designed payback, as a share of everything staked, over an enormous run of spins. At 96% with PHP 10 a spin over 500 spins, turnover is PHP 5,000 and the expected return is PHP 4,800, an expected loss of PHP 200. Treat it as the middle of a wide spread. One evening can land far from it.
- A higher RTP lowers the expected loss per peso wagered.
- It does not shorten a losing streak.
- Volatility, not RTP, decides how bumpy the ride is.
Total: use RTP to compare two games, never to predict a session.
High RTP Slots: What Counts as High
Among figures that exist, the spread is narrow: the PG Soft titles above sit between 96.73% and 96.95%, and the Pragmatic Play ones between 96.01% and 96.53%. Tenths of a point vanish inside one session’s swing.
Version Differences to Watch
A studio-published percentage describes the version the studio lists. Operators may select another one, and the lobby’s setting is not visible logged out.
| Studio | Version note |
|---|---|
| Pragmatic Play | Sweet Bonanza 1000 lists 96.53% with 95.52% and 94.51% also shipped; Sugar Rush lists 96.50% |
| PG Soft | Prints one figure per title on its game data |
| JILI | Prints none |
The Pragmatic Play lines in the games data mark 96.53% as the top of three operator-selectable versions for Sweet Bonanza 1000. So a lobby title may run a lower one, and the in-game info screen is the source. Wolf Gold sits at 96.01%, and Wild West Gold at 96.51% with 95.56% and 94.54% also confirmed.
Total: the figure is a ceiling for the title, and the game screen is the proof.
Next Pages
Pair this with the slot tips for TAYA365 before setting a stake. The JILI games list shows why its titles are described by ceiling and volatility instead. For the full studio map, return to the TAYA365 slot hub.
How to Get Started
-
Find the studio's own figure
Pragmatic Play and PG Soft each print one. For JILI, write not published.
-
Check the version
Operators can get lower-RTP builds from Pragmatic Play, so trust the number shown inside the game you opened.
-
Do the expected-loss sum
Turnover times (100 minus RTP) gives the long-run cost; one session scatters widely around it.




